Home Insights Work Experience Murphy v Cahill, 2012 ABQB 220 Murphy v Cahill, 2012 ABQB 220 Background Related solutions Finance + Banking Litigation Related Team Lindsey Miller Partner 780-423-7649 lmiller@fieldlaw.com Additional Work Experience Previous Next Prestie et al. v. Director, Regulatory Assurance Division, South, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, Appeal No. 23-119-121, & 24-25-R (AEAB), 2025 ABEAB 8 2025 Intervenor Decision: Tuttle et al. v. Director, Regulatory Assurance Division, South, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas re: Rimrock Renewables Ltd. Appeal Nos. 23-117-125 (AEAB), 2025 ABEAB 7 2025 Financing and leasing for a project in a regulated industry Protecting our clients' assets Providing practical advice on the FOIPP Act Policy Drafting
